[anti-abuse-wg] Some (old) numbers about the quality of contact information, was 2011-06 Discussion Period extended until 7 May 2012 (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)

All,

On Tuesday, 2012-04-17 11:00:23 +0200,
Denis Walker <denis at ripe.net> wrote: 
> 
> On 17/04/12:17 10:48 AM, Frank Gadegast wrote:
> > 
> > Do you think that the LIRs would complain, if the NCC asks
> > the maintainer with an automatic email to updated his or her
> > objects ? Cannot imagine it, because they DID supply an email
> > address, its simply wrong (old, forgotten or typing mistake or
> > deliberatly wrong).
> > 
> > 
> Here in lays another problem....you are assuming now that all
> maintainers email addresses are valid. We will present some stats on
> these in the DB WG presentation later this week. Here we are talking
> much more than 1.5% problems.

For historical context, here's a presentation I did in a while ago:

http://meetings.ripe.net/ripe-45/presentations/ripe45-db-contact-data.ppt

I have no idea if quality of contact data has gotten better or worse in
the last 9 years. :)

--
Shane

--
Shane