[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 Discussion Period extended until 7 May 2012 (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)

chrish at consol.net wrote:
> hi!
>
> On 04/16/2012 03:24 PM, Marco Schmidt wrote:
>> We encourage you to review this RIPE Policy Proposal and send your
>> comments to<anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>  by 7 May 2012.
>
> -1, unchanged. it's essentially unchanged, so the reasons as discussed on this ml are unchanged (

 > doesn't simplify

   - the abuse-c will remove all other appearances of abuse contact
     information
   - whois will return this one email address without
     any query limits
   - makes the maintenance of objects more easy, because you have
     to maintain only one contact instead of editing all your objects
     remark fields
   I would call this simplification.

> doesn't help,

   - it helps every one to find the right contact more easily manually
     and even helps people to find it for automatic reporting
   I would call it very helpfull.

> just complicates,

   A double negation of an argument is no new argument ;o)

> with foreseeable consecutive problems

   Wich ones do you see ?

Could you please summarize your doubts ?


The abuse-c will even raise the data quality because it can be validated
in future checks.
It will also raise the quality because it will remind the LIRs to
update their objects, when things are changing.


Kind regards, Frank

> - it's a step backwards).
>
> regards,
>
> 	Chris
--
MOTD: "have you enabled SSL on a website or mailbox today ?"
--
PHADE Software - PowerWeb                       http://www.powerweb.de
Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast             mailto:frank at powerweb.de
Schinkelstrasse 17                                fon: +49 33200 52920
14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany             fax: +49 33200 52921
======================================================================