[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 Discussion Period extended until 7 May 2012 (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)

On 17/04/12:17 10:48 AM, Frank Gadegast wrote:
> 
> Do you think that the LIRs would complain, if the NCC asks
> the maintainer with an automatic email to updated his or her objects ?
> Cannot imagine it, because they DID supply an email address,
> its simply wrong (old, forgotten or typing mistake or
> deliberatly wrong).
> 
> 
Here in lays another problem....you are assuming now that all
maintainers email addresses are valid. We will present some stats on
these in the DB WG presentation later this week. Here we are talking
much more than 1.5% problems.

I think this is one of the points Brian means. The issue of user data
accuracy is wider than just for abuse reporting.

regards
Denis Walker
Business Analyst
RIPE NCC Database Group