This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] abuse email address validation - VOTE
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse email address validation - VOTE
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse email address validation - VOTE
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Tue Apr 17 09:39:21 CEST 2012
Frank, On Saturday, 2012-04-14 22:46:53 +0200, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: > Im not talking about manual checks, those are automatic checks. > All checks I described are automatic checks, the last once > are only a bit more complicated to implement. Sure, I'm just saying that even manual checks are pretty cheap. But of course automated checks are really, really cheap. :) > > Personally I support both automated methods of checking contact > > So thats a +1 ? Yes, +1 to your proposal! -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse email address validation - VOTE
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse email address validation - VOTE
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]