[anti-abuse-wg] current business practices

hi,

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:50:02PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Frank Gadegast
> <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote:
> > will receives this could please make a
> > telnet mamba.ripe.net 25
> > from some IPs he own (best would be not using his or her usual IP,
> > if he or she likes, lets see how big that problem really
> > is, thats why I have to mail the most active people directly).
> 
> suresh at frodo 03:54:25 :~$ telnet mamba.ripe.net smtp
> Trying 2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1328...
> Trying 193.0.19.40...
> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
> 
> Things seem to be RIPE for a change eh?

So, what exactly causes the assumption that mamba is supposed to be
reachable from the outside, on Port 25?

$ host -t mx ripe.net 
ripe.net mail is handled by 250 postlady.ripe.net.
ripe.net mail is handled by 200 postgirl.ripe.net.

Now, obviously, expecting anti-spammers to understand about MX records
and how to read Received: lines might be asking for a bit much...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120411/76082102/attachment.sig>