This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] current business practices
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Laura Cobley
laura at ripe.net
Wed Apr 11 14:34:08 CEST 2012
Dear Florian and all, Over time, contact information in the RIPE Database can become outdated due to staffing changes, oversight and lack of knowledge on the part of the maintainer. Bringing the irregularity directly to the attention of this maintainer can be the quickest way to get it fixed. If you subsequently experience difficulties with this, we can help you to get in touch with the maintainer by forwarding your report to the person responsible for the Internet number resource registration. Handling reports is a normal part of our operations within the RIPE NCC and the report form makes it easier to get in touch with us. We ask you to include information such as mail delivery failure notices and copies of emails with headers, which clearly show the problem and the subsequent difficulties you are having. These help to substantiate the report. Our aim is to work together with you to further improve the quality of the data in the Internet number resource registry. Best regards, Laura Cobley RIPE NCC On 4/6/12 8:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Laura Cobley: > >> Using this form, you can now easily report various issues, including >> abnormalities in Internet number resource registrations, to us for >> further investigation. > > I looked at "Incorrect contact information in the RIPE Database", and > "I confirm that I have reported the incorrect information to all of > the contacts listed in the relevant object" is a required checkbox. > > This seems to require that complainants try postal addresses, phone > and fax numbers before reporting errors in email addresses. Is this > really your goal? Isn't this a step backwards? >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] current business practices
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]