This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 03:40:16 CEST 2012
Joe ALWAYS says everything I want to say, in much better detail. RIPE NCC can rely on the community for reports - but not for all the due diligence that RIPE staff would normally have to perform in validating those reports On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Joe St Sauver <joe at oregon.uoregon.edu> wrote: > A good Samaritan volunteer reporters has no obligation to do RIPE's work > for them, and any attempt to impose arbitrary additional obligations on > voluntary reporters is misplaced and inappropriate, and shows a lack of > respect for the community member making that report. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]