This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] {Disarmed} Re: Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] {Disarmed} Re: Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] {Disarmed} Re: Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 03:38:32 CEST 2012
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight <michele at blacknight.ie> wrote: > Just because an entity isn't based in the EU / RIPE region doesn't mean that > they are up to no good or that they don't have a valid reason to have an > allocation I'm not talking about *all* out of region allocations. However a company with the german GmbH in it and with an accomodation address in Panama .. The point is that if you see signs that a range is bad, and you also see signs of strangeness in the whois, sometimes it is a good idea to correlate them The same thing with ARIN or any other RIR whois .. if you find a UPS store maildrop with a bunch of /20s mapped to it .. and each successive /20 you find is entirely populated with "something bad" .. then a full text search of the RIR's db for all netblocks registered to that UPS store might be instructive. --srs
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] {Disarmed} Re: Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] {Disarmed} Re: Introducing the RIPE NCC Report Form
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]