This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Adrian
ripe-wg-antiabuse at kyubu.de
Wed Apr 4 10:37:34 CEST 2012
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:33:15PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Suresh, > The swiss ccTLD seems to have things set up just right - and I would be Correct me if I am wrong, but this was about RIPE is (not) doing? > for 30 days if an application to this effect is made by an agency > appropriately recognised by the Swiss Federal Office of Communications > (OFCOM). The holder may demand a contestable order against the block from > the Federal Office of Police (FEDPOL) within 30 days of its commencement. > Otherwise, the further procedure and process is governed by the relevant > provisions of the Ordinance on Addressing Resources in the > Telecommunications Sector (OARTS). This defines how things are running after complaints are raised. I doubt they would go deeper other than checking if their standards are met, so this would not prevent me from setting up a malicious .ch domain. Cheers, Adrian
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]