[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database) - addtional needs

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:46:38AM +0100, Frank Gadegast wrote:

hi,

> At least an abuse-c is much nicer to parse for the normal people than
> an IRT object, because it will appear in the normal whois output for
> any IP asked for.

This is also true for the IRT object. Parsing is as easy as parsing any other object.

> - how or who will test, if an abuce-c is correct ?
> - will the whois state, who to contact (or wich URL to visit),
>   if an abuse-c isnt reachable or correct ?
> - what is happening, if the abuce-c isnt correct ?

Thanks for bringing up these questions. Trusted Introducer solved all of these some time ago.

Cheers, Adrian