[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)

Hello all,

thanks for the already ongoing discussion about the new abuse contact
policy proposal. I will try to clarify some things.

We had some really technical discussions about this with database people
from RIPE NCC and came up with this idea.

So let's have a look at it.

If we use a person object as an example, this person object can be
referenced for example by an admin-c or tech-c attribute at the moment.

In future it can be referenced by the abuse-c as well, BUT to create
this reference the person objects needs to have an abuse-mailbox
attribute. If there is no abuse-mailbox attribute it can not be
referenced by the abuse-c. This will be done by the business logic.

Same when you query for an ip range - admin-c, tech-c and abuse-c can be
the same person, but output will show an abuse-mailbox attribute in the
abuse-c part.

So at the end it is only a matter, if the attributes requested by the
business rules are existing for the intended use of the object.


I will answer the other questions on the mailing list directly. Just
wanted to give a real quick overview about the technical idea of the
Task Force and RIPE NCC.

Thanks,

Tobias

-- 
abusix






-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20111124/07ec20f4/attachment.sig>