[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)

Hello,

This policy proposal seems a bit incomplete to, as it fails to address
the problem statement from the summary.

>From the summary: "...it is not clear whether to use the
"abuse-mailbox:" attribute, the "remark:" attribute or an irt object.".
What is supposed to happen to IRT objects, or data from them?

For existing records: at the very least it should be explicit which tags
should no longer be used or would be deprecated / removed in order to
give clear guidance.

Another point: if the general idea of the policy is acceptable, wouldn't
it be nice to have 2 abuse mailboxes: one for humans, one for bots?

Best,
Gilles

-- 
Fondation RESTENA - DNS-LU
6, rue Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg
tel: (+352) 424409
fax: (+352) 422473