This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database) - addtional needs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Nov 23 18:19:59 CET 2011
it is an interesting question, followed by the 'what is ripe to do in cases where is requirement isnt complied with, or where it is fraudulent' question --srs (iPad) On 23-Nov-2011, at 20:18, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote: > Hi, > > The proposed policy text includes: > > "The role objects used for abuse contact information will be required to contain a single "abuse-mailbox:" attribute which is intended for receiving automatic and manual reports about abusive behavior originating the resource holders' networks." > > Do the proposers intend the requirement for the "abuse-mailbox:" attribute to be enforced in any way and if so, how? > > Thanks, > > Leo >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database) - addtional needs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]