This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse finder tweak? Re: inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse finder tweak? Re: inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Tue May 10 11:21:15 CEST 2011
All, On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 19:45 +0000, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > Actually, it is. The string to enter in the web interface, in the input box is: > > -BL 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255 > > or alternatively, you should be able to select the -L or -l from the > "Advanced Search Form" interface. > > But it looks like over there it is not offered on a simple point-n-click basis ;-) > Nevertheless, each individual flag option can be requested explicitely in the > input field of the web-inerface. I tried the "Abuse Finder" tool for this and it didn't seem to help: http://lab.db.ripe.net/portal/abuse-finder.htm The heuristics are described here: http://labs.ripe.net/Members/Paul_P_/content-updated-heuristics-abuse-finder-service Maybe it makes sense to have some fallback to non-abuse-specific contacts (admin-c/tech-c) if no abuse contacts have been defined? Perhaps with a warning that no actual abuse contacts have been registered.... -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse finder tweak? Re: inetnum: 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]