This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] LIR membership
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] LIR membership, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks, was Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Sun Mar 13 20:31:44 CET 2011
Shane Kerr wrote: [...] > I don't represent an LIR, so it feels a bit weird to recommend changes > to the process. If it is too easy, some things can be done. Perhaps some > sort of process where you need to be introduced by another LIR before > you can join? It would be a low hurdle, but it might be something. This would definitely raise some eyebrows, as has been said already. Moreover, I'd expect serious procedural problems for some regions and/or types of applicants. > -- > Shane I think this approach is neither useful nor feasible - and it wouldn't achieve the goal, on top of it ;-) Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] LIR membership, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks, was Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]