This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Thu Mar 10 14:24:45 CET 2011
* Gert Doering: > This is the whole point. There might be a business relation with a local > LIR already, and that's way easier for "smallish companies" than to do > international contracts with Amstedam. Some transit providers require LIR status in their contracts (presumably, they don't want to deal with abuse complaints, RIPE policy changes, and so on, so this is understandable). Relying on an existing LIR is not always an option, even for small companies. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]