[anti-abuse-wg] Re: Interaction between the RIPE and anti-abuse communities]

Purely a coordination role - where regulators and law enforcement may
well have a role to play when there's malware involved.

And yes, I do mean the people at govcert.nl

thanks
--srs

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
<Woeber at cc.univie.ac.at> wrote:
> Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
>> That is only useful if the organization doing so has some sort of
>> oversight or escalation power over what the receiver of those
>> complaints is supposed to do.
>>
>> It might actually make sense to involve the dutch CERT in this.
>
> Which one? I presume you are thinking about GOVCERT.nl ?
>
> If I am right, what would be that CERT's role with regard to this
> discussion?
>
>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> wrote:
>>
>>>Agreed, especially if the procedure provides for handing complaints to
>>>external abuse teams, e.g. according to IP allocations.
>
> Wilfried
> (wearing my ACOnet-CERT scarf for a moment :-) )
>
>



-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)