This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Re: Off-topic: German government involvement with DENIC policy, was draft policy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Off-topic: German government involvement with DENIC policy, was draft policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Off-topic: German government involvement with DENIC policy, was draft policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Gadegast
ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de
Wed Mar 9 21:52:19 CET 2011
Shane Kerr wrote: > Frank, > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 19:27 +0100, Frank Gadegast wrote: >> But the German citizens could not at all through whatever government >> could tell DENIC what to do. > > This really is wildly off-topic, but exactly this happened: > > http://www.dmueller.com/2009/10/18/domain-names-domains/denic-to-make-million-dollar-domains-available-for-the-first-time/ > > A reminder that governments are the ones in charge. :) Really off-topic now :o( Its not citizens telling DENIC what to do. It was a German court, and surely DENIC has to do something then ... If Nederland court is telling RIPE NCC to stop forming their internal regulations after the comments from non-members, RIPE NCC will also have to do something too. Great idea btw :o) Anyway: took this from RIPEs homepage "The RIPE NCC is an independent, not-for-profit membership organisation" So again (I want an answer now): why should RIPE NCC has to form it internal procedures and regulations after the will of the world ? And from ripe-514 "10.2 The Executive Board may, at its own discretion, consult the Members about any decisions it plans to take." And I do not find any note, that RIPE-NCC has to listen to whatever-what-people-say arround the world, its only about members ... So it would be the most-easy way to ask its members several abuse-related things at the next general metting (oh, Im so naive). So why should I not attend the next GM and ask: "do we want to have the abuse-mailbox-field to change to be mandatory ?" and we just have a vote there at the GM and finish all the discussion of the last year ? > -- > Shane > > Kind regards, Frank -- PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank at powerweb.de Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 ======================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Off-topic: German government involvement with DENIC policy, was draft policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Off-topic: German government involvement with DENIC policy, was draft policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]