[anti-abuse-wg] draft policy

> I defny vote for that RIPE drafts should only be discussed
> by RIPE members and that a 50% votes of RIPE members are enough
> to accept a draft.

Therein lies stagnation, but perhaps that is what you're aiming for?

Assuming you mean RIPE NCC members (anybody can be a member of RIPE, it 
is just a community, and your guess as to the number of members of the 
community is as good as anybody's), then when I looked a couple of years 
ago, 2% of RIPE NCC members voted for the members of the NCC's executive 
board.

2%.

How many of the members do you think get actively involved in policy 
discussions?  (Hint: it is much less than 50%.)

All of the RIRs have open policy discussion forums, just as the IETF has 
no members and anybody can contribute to the Internet's standards.  Good 
luck changing that. :)

Rob