This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Mar 9 14:13:43 CET 2011
If it was just spammers with large netblocks, great. There is no shortage of PI / PA netblocks which are used to host, for example, malware c&c. While what you say is more than probably correct, it is strange that spammers seem to prefer the RIPE region, and working through some LIRs in eastern europe, to acquiring large netblocks from any other RIR region in the world. On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > > As long as "the spammers" are providing correct corporate documents, and > operate within their legal framework, I don't see any way to *deny* them > IPv4/IPv6 addresses. "Sending lots of mail" might be a perfectly > legitimate business in some country in the RIPE NCC service region, and > as such, "need to use IP addresses for my legitimate business" is > appropriate for a needs-based allocation system... > -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]