[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:29 PM, peter h <peter at hk.ipsec.se> wrote:
> I have no problem with blocklists ipv6. Larger chunks however :-)
>
> I do have problem with abuse, where spam is the dominant factor, often
> used as vehicle for other kinds of fraud.

At least some blocklists have moved to support v6 listings ..

Quoting from http://virbl.bit.nl/

15-01-2010:

We've changed Virbl today, which makes it the first fully IPv6 enabled
dnsbl, as far as we can tell. You could already reach Virbl via IPv6
for years, but no IPv6 hosts were served by the nameserver. rbldnsd,
on which we ran Virbl before, does not understand IPv6 in its zones.

We changed some things today:

   1. We implemented a way to list machines with IPv6 and privacy-extensions
   2. We switched from rbldnsd to Bind
   3. We've changed the website so the changes made in '1' are visible
on the website as well


-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)