This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed Mar 9 03:41:49 CET 2011
Suresh, On Mar 8, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: […] > It is a fact you will have to acknowledge first before you can even > begin to put in place any measures to stop it .. and that does not > seem to be the case as far as I can see. I am sure that if it was not a problem you would not keep complaining about it. That being said, it is quite sad that those of you who repeatedly return and complain never put forward a formal proposal to change the allocation policy. I personally don't understand why you have not done this. Presumably changing the policy so that the space doesn't get distributed to the people you don't like in the first place would go quite some way to solving your problem. Regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]