This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Jul 28 10:46:11 CEST 2011
Let us put it this way - RIPE should check those lists for hijacked netblocks. And evidence of other fraudulent behavior exhibited during the RIPE registration process (eg : the numerous fake LIRs, assigned PI / PA netblocks allocated to botmasters with fake whois etc) On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight <michele at blacknight.ie> wrote: > > On 28 Jul 2011, at 09:12, Frank Gadegast wrote: > >> >> Looks like to me, that RIPE NCC should defny compare RIPEs netblocks >> to several blacklists. This will indicate highjacked or misused >> netblocks quite easily. > > > That's out of scope for RIPE > > Just because a netblock is blacklisted by a list doesn't actually mean much and as a RIPE member I would be very annoyed if they started getting into this kind of thing -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]