This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Procedure Regarding LIR Information in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Procedure Regarding LIR Information in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Procedure Regarding LIR Information in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Jul 27 13:50:44 CEST 2011
And if possible a geographical breakdown of regions from which LIRs were de-registered. On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Thor Kottelin <thor.kottelin at turvasana.com> wrote: > > Can you estimate how many cases of incorrect registration data third parties > have reported to the RIPE NCC since RIPE-517 became effective and how the > final results of those reports are distributed between e.g. compliance and > deregistration? > -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Procedure Regarding LIR Information in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Procedure Regarding LIR Information in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]