This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Yay. More /14s in spamhaus.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Yay. More /14s in spamhaus.
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Yay. More /14s in spamhaus.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Fri Feb 11 10:13:32 CET 2011
The whois already says they are reclaiming the /14 - but I think it'd have been better to improve their vetting procedures to ensure that such allocations never did take place. They do scrutinize paperwork for IP justification, hardware etc so it would be interesting to see what justification needs to be done to get a /14, and what is done to verify the accuracy of said paperwork. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote: > > Perhaps you are implying that the RIPE community or the RIPE NCC should > do something to revoke address space from networks used for certain > activities? -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Yay. More /14s in spamhaus.
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Yay. More /14s in spamhaus.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]