[anti-abuse-wg] Recent Proposals, the Taskforce & v6 Discussion

Ah, right, yes, there was no actual policy proposal following that 
presentation and when thinking in RIPE terms proposal has a very 
particular term, hence the confusion.

A lot of work has been done on this by the NCC, did you get a chance to 
read the NCC document on closure and deregistration procedure as 
presented at RIPE 61 in Rome (see 
http://www.ripe.net/legal/Closure-of-LIR-and-deregistration-of-INRs_final-draft.pdf). 
I linked that a couple of days ago, but it's worth repeating.

Brian.

"Suresh Ramasubramanian" wrote the following on 03/02/2011 14:33:
> As for Uwe I was thinking of the proposals he submitted at ripe 59.
> I'll ping him for a followup
>
> H. Recovering resources assigned to non-existing entities
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-59/presentations/rasmussen-recovering-resources.pdf
> Uwe Manuel Rasmussen, Microsoft
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Brian Nisbet<brian.nisbet at heanet.ie>  wrote:
>>
>> First off, the proposals. Suresh, I'm not sure which proposal from Uwe
>> you're talking about, sorry, but Tobias&  Piotr's proposals, or at least the
>> addressing of the issues they identified are progressing. Tobias has been in
>> discussion with the NCC DB group and the other proposals are, well, proposed
>> to be dealt with by the task force.
>
>
>