[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61

* Brian Nisbet:

> Remote participation was possible, with a live video feed. This
> comment, some two months after RIPE 61, is the first comment that has
> been made about this. And while I am not in any way ignoring it I
> don't think it's unfair to say that it suggests the WG were either in
> support or ambivalent towards what happened?

It was quite different to figure out, based on the transcript, what
was going on.  It would have been nice to announce the intention of
removing the WG chair beforehand, on the mailing list.  I think the
whole thing is quite odd and unnecessary, but it's happened.  The main
lesson to me seems that RIPE needs a clear procedure for removing WG
chairs before their term ends.  Beyond that, it's probably time to
move on.

That being said, so far, I've refrained from commenting on the WG
session because I wanted to give the task force a chance to produce
results.  What's the status with that?  Will the task force conduct
its business mostly on a public mailing list, or behind closed doors?

-- 
Florian Weimer                <fweimer at bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99