This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Feb 1 18:02:02 CET 2011
Hi, > For discussions about policy changes by organizations with massive > potential power, the calls for change need to be rather precise, IMO. > The calls for change need to worry as much about the dangers of the > change as they do about the need for it. Exactly. I am sure that any RIPE working group would accept a policy proposal that defines a policy to prevent abuse while taking these dangers into account. Many people have asked for policy to prevent abuse, but none have come up with a workable proposal. I wish there was an easy solution for this... Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes - RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]