[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61

Emmanuelle, thank you for posting this.

If this discussion you refer to did take place, I do agree that it is
something the antispam community at large has moved on from over a
decade back, and shifted its focus to operational mitigation -
something that really should be relevant to this WG.

I would urgently request that abuse-wg members please try to also
involve their colleagues who work on abuse rather than routing / dns
teams.

The upcoming Paris maawg should provide ample opportunity for european
SPs (several of whom are also maawg members) to attend and participate
in these discussions from another perspective.

thanks
--srs

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Emanuele Balla <balla at spin.it> wrote:
>
>
> The discussion suddenly turned into how "Spam in general cannot be defined".
> A discussion the email industry had almost 10 years ago and moved forth.
> And about how "It doesn't make any sense in almost all cases".
>
> Proposals about how to add correctives to the paper? Zero.
> About how to use the idea in order to obtain better policies? Zero.



-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)