This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] size DOES matter (sorry, had to use this subject :o)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Steve Linford
linford at spamhaus.org
Mon Dec 19 21:47:11 CET 2011
On 19 Dec 2011, at 18:41, russ at consumer.net wrote: > This is exactly what Spamhaus did when they got sued and they posted all those > child-like messages on their web site. In the end the court found they lied and they paid all kinds of > legal fees because of it. OK people, I know I've been cryogenically frozen for the last 10 years but you really need to tell me these things... We were found to have lied by a court? When? And we paid "all kinds of legal fees" because of it? Why doesn't anybody tell me these things! Steve Linford The Spamhaus Project http://www.spamhaus.org
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] size DOES matter (sorry, had to use this subject :o)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]