This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dave CROCKER
dhc at dcrocker.net
Mon Dec 19 17:11:35 CET 2011
On 12/19/2011 5:30 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > But that isn't any reason to tar all spam filtering with the same brush. Perhaps you are underestimating some people's requirement for absolute perfection in the world? (Their version of perfection, not yours or mine, of course...) d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]