[anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy

 >But that isn't any reason to tar all spam filtering with the same brush.

I never said all abuse lists are bad or are run poorly, some of them are 
run very well and provide tremendous benefits and I use them.  I am just 
saying they need to live by the same standards as everyone else.

I have dealt with the abuse desk you ran before if you remember me.  I 
tried to respond to an e-mail from the network you ran and it was 
blocked.  Your abuse desk told me other people on my netblock were 
spammers and I was supposed to go to my hosting provider and somehow 
make it stop.    I had no idea (or power) to do anything about it and I 
had no idea what anyone else on the netblock was doing.  When I ask for 
proof of the claims you never sent anything or explained further 
(although you did unblock me).  These are some of the crazy stunts 
pulled by abuse departments that has no basis in law or common sense.

Thank You