This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] How to find abandoned networks (was Spam FAQs need revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How to find abandoned networks (was Spam FAQs need revision)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How to find abandoned networks (was Spam FAQs need revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 10:54:33 CET 2011
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote: > I think that the ARIN policy only mandates that unresponsive contacts be > clearly identified, and no further actions are taken. And this makes future efforts in the right direction easier, I expect. It also deters hijacking to some extent. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How to find abandoned networks (was Spam FAQs need revision)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How to find abandoned networks (was Spam FAQs need revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]