This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] How to find abandoned networks (was Spam FAQs need revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How to find abandoned networks (was Spam FAQs need revision)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How to find abandoned networks (was Spam FAQs need revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 10:41:59 CET 2011
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote: > To be clear, I'm not advocating hiding things in the Whois, I just don't > see any value in spending resources to find unresponsive contacts if the > only point is to label them in the Whois. I guess when you are trying to > report a problem it can save the effort of sending an e-mail if the But this effort was, I thought, aimed at identifying defunct entities that still hold IP space and attempt to reclaim it? --srs
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How to find abandoned networks (was Spam FAQs need revision)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How to find abandoned networks (was Spam FAQs need revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]