This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Tue Dec 13 20:24:28 CET 2011
On 13/Dec/11 12:39, Laura Cobley wrote: > > We are working on improving the procedures and documentation in the > area of reporting abuse. As part of this work, we have already > rewritten the FAQs currently being discussed on this list. > > We will inform you as soon as the revised FAQs are published. Thank you so much! It is quite curious that this WG shouldn't able to suggest an adequate wording...
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]