[anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy

and s/gmail/any other provider/ and my statement below would still
apply.  I'm not picking on gmail or yahoo here.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> No no... let's not confine conversation to one mailbox, or one small
> personal domain.  Please.
>
> If you run a large enough mail system, you'll see quite a lot of spam
> issues on gmail as well (google groups and other google properties
> too, just as you'd see distinct yahoo properties such as yahoogroups
> have their own abuse volumes, challenges etc)
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:24 PM, peter h <peter at hk.ipsec.se> wrote:
>>
>> It's years ago since i had any mail conversation with a yahoo-customer. But i still get
>> spam from various yahoo-ranges, none of them related to former contacts. It's simply
>> a lazy policy that allows abuse of their resources.
>
>
>
> --
> Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)



-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)