This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Athina Fragkouli
athina.fragkouli at ripe.net
Thu Aug 18 14:32:49 CEST 2011
Dear all, Thank you very much for your comments. Regarding the nature of a valid complaint and the inconsistent registration: A complaint sent to the RIPE NCC is valid if it refers to a matter the RIPE NCC is responsible for. The RIPE NCC is responsible for implementing RIPE Policies and for making sure that LIRs and End Users with independent resources comply with RIPE Policies. Accordingly, a registration is inconsistent if it is not correct and updated. Regarding audits before 2009: The RIPE NCC reported on audits (including audits before 2009) at RIPE 61: http://ripe61.ripe.net/presentations/331-Update_RIPE_NCC_R61.pdf (see slide 10) Regarding the total amount of IP addresses deregistered as a result of audits: Deregistered allocations: one /21 and one /17 Deregistered PI assignments: one /22, four /23s and four /24s Kind regards, Athina Fragkouli RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]