This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Aug 17 19:59:49 CEST 2011
Athina Fragkouli wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Following discussions and comments on the mailing list, we would like to > inform you about the current status of audits and handling abuse > complaints, and on plans to improve the way we deal with these. Thanks for the numbers! > Currently, abuse complaints come in via abuse at ripe.net. Just wondering.... On the sender's end, an address of "abuse at something.tld" usually, raises some semantic expectations, in some environments. I am not proposing to abandon or to replace "abuse at ripe.net", because it probably does serve a valid purpose, within the fremawork of the assumed semantics (as Peter has pointed out already!), but rather to create a sort of formal complaints process against an LIR. This process of course SHOULD include some serious safeguards (<quote>When this is a valid complaint</quote>), to avoid beeing misused for DoS attacks on the administrative plane ;-) Wilfried. > When this is a > valid complaint, we investigate the matter, we contact the relevant LIR > and we execute an audit on the LIR. > > Apart from audits initiated by complaints, we also execute audits of > randomly selected LIRs as well as LIRs in whose registration records we > notice inconsistencies. > > Here are some statistics on the number of audits and on the outcomes of > those audits: > - 2009: 319 audits, all LIRs were in order or complied with auditors’ > instructions > - 2010: 447 audits, seven PI assignments were deregistered > - 2011: 234 audits, 124 are complete, two LIRs were closed as a result > of the audits, two PI assignments were deregistered, 110 audits are ongoing > > For confidentiality reasons, the RIPE NCC does not report on individual > audits, on the changes/amendments made in the audits or on the > comments/communication with the LIR during the audit. > > Reports on audits will take place during the update from the RIPE NCC at > the RIPE NCC Services Working Group at every RIPE Meeting. > > We acknowledge there is a lack of clarity and transparency on our abuse > and complaint procedure. We are in the process of redeveloping this > process to improve our services in this area. We will present the > revised process during the RIPE 63 Meeting in Vienna. > > Because we are in the process of setting this up, we welcome your > feedback and any experiences you would like to share on this mailing > list. We will not comment on each and every suggestion, but we will take > the feedback/comments into account in developing this new procedure. > > Kind regards, > Athina Fragkouli > RIPE NCC > >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]