This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Wed Aug 17 19:08:34 CEST 2011
Hello Athina, many thanks for this report. > Currently, abuse complaints come in via abuse at ripe.net. When this is a > valid complaint, we investigate the matter, we contact the relevant LIR > and we execute an audit on the LIR. This, read in isolation, could support misunderstandings, at least I'm about to be confused. What nature of "complaints" would initiate an audit? I'm confident that "valid" above means that the complaint has significant indication that either the LIR as such has issues with its existence or legal status or the object maintained by the LIR or the respective assignee has such issues or raises serious doubts, failure to clear which would raise a process violation by the LIR. I'd not read this as "a customer of LIR x sent me spam and therefore the LIR is now undergoing an audit. Thanks, Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]