[anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database

This doesn't suggest "repairing" misreports, it suggests ignoring them
as not statistically significant enough to affect a particular
account's reputation.

So, your automated FBL processing doesn't freeze the account, while
the guy with a virus or a compromise gets his account detected and
frozen by that very same script.

"Handling" or "repairing" misreports any further is just not needed
when you look at it that way.

--srs

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> wrote:
>
>
> This comparison apparently suggests that misreports ought to be handled and
> repaired, just like viruses or compromised passwords, however statistically
> negligible they might be.  (It could even possible to devise methods to
> handle misreports so as to minimize the amount of time that the relevant
> abuse team has to spend on manual investigation.)
>
> Is that what you meant?



-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)