[anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database

Nial & me tested "abuse.tiws at telefonica.com" which as well mentioned on the RIPE webpage you mentioned on your 1st thread.
In any events, an abuse@ given to RIPE authority by an allocated network should be working for any IP# on planet earth.

Then you come up with security.tiws?
I get the same reply:550 5.1.1 <abuse.tiws>: Recipient address rejected.
This time, that IP# isn't located in Miami USA but rather in Buenos Aires, Bresil. South America. 
A heck of a nice little walk from where you are.
No mistake there, the language over there is Portuguese and not Spanish.
Beside, any idea of the distance between those 2 cities?

Still, as of now, i didn't seen any threat related to the lack of replies from these peoples? They may be busy fighthing something?
Or simply reconfigurating their things with "Trial" IP# ?
They seem to establish networks worlwide...
Maybe they're using IP# normally under RIPE authority but they'll be back!

Who knows?
Why would one be so severe?
=================================
Resolving smtpar.telefonica.com...]
[Contacting smtpar.telefonica.com [200.51.80.21]...]
[Connected]
220 ESMTP IMSVA
EHLO Network-Tools.com
250-artasgw002.latam.telefonica.corp
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 20971520
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-8BITMIME
250 DSN
VRFY security.tiws
550 5.1.1 <security.tiws>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table
RSET
============================

> -----Original Message-----
> From: info at webservice.be
> Sent: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:07:30 +0200
> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database
> 
> 
> The emailadress I contacted was the one where they mention the AS-number
> remarks:   Any Notification about AS12956 security please e-mail to :
> remarks:   security.tiws at telefonica.com
> 
> 
> 
> I got a bounce from it:
> 
> Generating server: latam.telefonica.corp
> 
> security.tiws at telefonica.com
> #550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found
> ##rfc822;security.tiws at telefonica.com
> 
> Original message headers:
> 
> Received: from ARTASMSP072.latam.telefonica.corp (10.213.2.21) by
>  ARTASMSP063.latam.telefonica.corp (10.213.1.32) with Microsoft SMTP
> Server
>  (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:12:06 -0300
> Received: from artasgw002.latam.telefonica.corp (192.168.200.7) by
>  ARTASMSP072.latam.telefonica.corp (10.213.2.21) with Microsoft SMTP
> Server id
>  8.3.83.0; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:16:14 -0300
> Received: from artasgw002.latam.telefonica.corp (unknown [127.0.0.1])	by
> IMSA
>  (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35D02C8065	for <security.tiws at telefonica.com>;
> Mon,
>   8 Aug 2011 11:56:46 -0300 (ART)
> Received: from smtpauth.pi-group.net (unknown [94.126.48.65])	by
>  artasgw002.latam.telefonica.corp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5341C2C8059	for
>  <security.tiws at telefonica.com>; Mon,  8 Aug 2011 11:56:45 -0300 (ART)
> Received: from [192.168.0.129] (d54C0DB02.access.telenet.be
> [84.192.219.2])
> 	(Authenticated sender: admingent)	by smtpauth.pi-group.net (Postfix)
> with
>  ESMTPA id B96A01D4175;	Mon,  8 Aug 2011 14:11:54 +0200 (CEST)
> Message-ID: <4E3FD2A2.4050605 at webservice.be>
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:12:18 +0200
> From: Webservice <info at webservice.be>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18)
> Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: <security.tiws at telefonica.com>
> CC: Cloudforce <cloudforce at ris.be>
> Subject: BGP conflict
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Op 09-08-11 18:59, Thor Kottelin schreef:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg-
>>> admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of abuse at localhost.com
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 7:02 PM
>>> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
>> 
>>> Reply from "abuse.tiws at telefonica.com";=>
>>> 10 smtpus.telefonica.com [216.177.207.223].
>>> 550 5.1.1 <abuse.tiws>:
>>> Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table.
>> 
>> rcpt to:<abuse.tiws at telefonica.com>
>> 250 2.1.5 Ok
>> 
>> Did you, by any chance, omit the domain name (as "<abuse.tiws>" would
>> seem
>> to indicate), or did you actually send mail and receive a bounce
>> afterwards?
>> 
>> If the address is incorrect, you could report the matter to the RIPE
>> NCC, as
>> Ms Fragkouli explained a few days ago.
>> 
>> The remaining addresses also seem to work:
>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: thor.kottelin at turvasana.com
>>>> Sent: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 18:17:33 +0300
>>>> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
>> 
>>>> OOM-RIPE
>> 
>> 250 2.1.5 Ok
>> 
>>>> RSB20-RIPE
>> 
>> 250 2.1.5 Ok
>> 
>>>> NSA20-RIPE
>> 
>> 250 2.1.5 Ok
>> 
>>>> HNM15-RIPE
>> 
>> 250 2.1.5 Ok
>> 
>>>> COO5-RIPE
>> 
>> 250 2.1.5 Ok
>> 
> 
> --
> --
> www.webservice.be
> Amelsdorp 72, 3740 Bilzen, Belgium
> Tel: +32.89257404, Fax: +32.70423475

____________________________________________________________
Receive Notifications of Incoming Messages
Easily monitor multiple email accounts & access them with a click.
Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out!