This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thor Kottelin
thor.kottelin at turvasana.com
Tue Aug 9 18:59:32 CEST 2011
> -----Original Message----- > From: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- > admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of abuse at localhost.com > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 7:02 PM > To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > Reply from "abuse.tiws at telefonica.com";=> > 10 smtpus.telefonica.com [216.177.207.223]. > 550 5.1.1 <abuse.tiws>: > Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table. rcpt to:<abuse.tiws at telefonica.com> 250 2.1.5 Ok Did you, by any chance, omit the domain name (as "<abuse.tiws>" would seem to indicate), or did you actually send mail and receive a bounce afterwards? If the address is incorrect, you could report the matter to the RIPE NCC, as Ms Fragkouli explained a few days ago. The remaining addresses also seem to work: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: thor.kottelin at turvasana.com > > Sent: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 18:17:33 +0300 > > To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > > OOM-RIPE 250 2.1.5 Ok > > RSB20-RIPE 250 2.1.5 Ok > > NSA20-RIPE 250 2.1.5 Ok > > HNM15-RIPE 250 2.1.5 Ok > > COO5-RIPE 250 2.1.5 Ok -- Thor Kottelin http://www.anta.net/
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]