This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 16:31:56 CEST 2011
This is a question I have, as well. On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Vissers, Pepijn <P.Vissers at opta.nl> wrote: > > Agreed; does anyone have an overview of audits that has been conducted by RIPE NCC and their outcome? Or are those reports non-public? > > Question: the audit procedure is documented in http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-423. Are the audit criteria documented in http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/member-support/audit? Because the latter document does not say anything about the presumed correctness of most of the records? -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]