This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 15:37:13 CEST 2011
Which is what is sought to be addressed. Granted the due diligence exists, but the fact remains that there are botmasters and spammers who manage to game this process. While the LIR revocation process exists, a more "user friendly" / transparent complaint handling mechanism and periodic audits might make things interesting On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet <Woeber at cc.univie.ac.at> wrote: > > But if you succeed in forging that type of documents, or if you succeed to > get some "official entity" to help in doing that, the NCC is at the loosing > end of the stick :-( -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]