[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Procedure Regarding LIR Information in the RIPE Database

On 8 Aug 2011, at 10:26, Alessandro Vesely wrote:

> On 08.08.2011 10:03, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>> While the abuse contact wg would be good to develop a standard format
>> for noting an abuse contact in RIPE whois, it is hardly the place to
>> deal with netblocks registered with fake contact information, and
>> quite possibly registered with faked justification paperwork.
> 
> I'd hope some practical hints proposition to define a workable acceptation of
> the term "faked" is also on-topic.

+1

"out of date", for example, is not "fake" - it's just not accurate  *now*

Which is a very different proposition to "faked" 

> 
>> RIPE's existing policies *should* cover this - but there's a notable
>> lack of a formalized resolution process on the lines of wdprs for
>> domains.
> 
> What is the current policy about the right to anonymity, for Whois Data
> Problem Reporting System?  

In ICANN?

That's one of the many reasons why the WHOIS policy is so badly broken


> It is often said that e-commerce sites cannot be
> anonymous.  It should be added that email sites also cannot.  In fact, an
> email site may grant the right to anonymity to its users, but IMHO it needs
> not be anonymous itself for doing so properly.
> 

Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.mobi/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612 
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845