[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?

In an earlier post, Florian Weimer mentioned the following:
 
> My personal problem with these reports is that they are totally
> incomprehensible to me.  Why do you think the netblocks have been
> hijacked?  Maybe the documentation in the WHOIS database is outdated,
> and Link Telecom still enjoys full control over those prefixes.

If one carry a lookup on RIPE website, and finds erroneous datas regarding the registration of a given IP# assignation, "Who's" HOIS database is outdated in such case?
For instance, a false non-existant or outdated email address.
Else, a civic address located in a vacant field?

Why would you care so much if a network 800 miles from your civic address in another country got highkacked?
You ain't a public employee of all RIPE's registered network?

The only thing RIPE have legal and justified reasons to ask any network and LIR to whom RIPE allocates IP# is true and real datas such as valid email addresses and full civic location.

Anybody has a problem with this?
Go ahead, everybody's listening.

Thank to read me.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fw at deneb.enyo.de
> Sent: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:44:12 +0200
> To: ops.lists at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?

____________________________________________________________
Share photos & screenshots in seconds...
TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if1
Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social networks.