This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Thu Sep 30 03:30:07 CEST 2010
On Sep 29, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Richard Cox wrote: > Ronald F Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: >> In my own experience, there do exist quite a substantial number of ARIN >> whois records which, as we speak, contain either outright fradulent, or >> semi-fradulent information, including entity names, snail-mail addresses, >> phone numbers, and contact e-mail addresses. > > Sure. That's not what I was talking about. All RIRs have that problem > to a greater or lesser degree. What seems to me to be unique to RIPE is > the frequency of assignment of IP blocks/ASNs, to entities that fail to > qualify for those resources under the relevant RIR's policies. Can you please substantiate this claim? Thanks, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]