This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Cox
richard.cox at btuser.net
Thu Sep 30 02:54:22 CEST 2010
Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> asked: > By "passed" I'm assuming that you mean that you've confirmed > that 195.80.148.0/22 is rather on the dodgy side, yes? The routing is certainly not what those involved want us to think it is. > Does Moldova have its own LIR? It has sixteen (still-operational) LIRs; one of those is Starnet. > Is that the one that requested this block? That seems quite likely, but only the RIPE NCC would know for sure. (which is why we need the LIR information to be in the WHOIS data). > Please tell me that _somebody_ is responsible here. Responsible? Responsible to whom? -- Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]