This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Sep 29 23:26:12 CEST 2010
Hi Richard, > Additionally if I were > the actual proposer of a policy, I would be unable to contribute to > that (or any related) decision-making-process. Which is why I'd be > a lot happier if other participants would consider making proposals. Don't worry about this. That's one reason why a working group has more than one chair :-) We sometimes have this situation in the Address Policy Working Group. Look at proposal 2010-04 for example. Gert proposed it and took part in the discussion. I don't take part in any discussion so I can make an objective decision on whether the working group reached consensus ore not. And then the whole working group chairs collective checks to see if I have followed the process correctly and that my decision about consensus is correct. You can write a proposal. There are enough safeguards to make sure that the policy development process is followed in a fair, honest, clear, transparent, etc way. Looking forward to your first proposal! Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]