This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Time Stamps (?)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Time Stamps (?)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Time Stamps (?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Tue Sep 28 03:05:42 CEST 2010
In message <6D779DA7-C665-409B-903C-FC0A7DB47BBF at icann.org>, you wrote: >On 27 Sep 2010, at 4:57, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > >[...] > >> So anyway, has it ever been considered to add date/time stamps to RIPE >> whois records, at least for record _creation_ if not also for last >> modification time? > >Andrei Robachevsky proposed something along those lines a while back: > >http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-40/presentations/timestamping/index.= >html > >I remember that there were some objections but as this was almost a decade = >ago it is possible that people have changed their minds. All I can say is that we here in ARIN space seem to have been surviving having time stamps on our whois records, without too many ill effects, for quite a long time now. (And the world hasn't come to an end, as far as I know.) Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Time Stamps (?)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Time Stamps (?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]